Skip to main content

P. T. Forsyth and Martyn Lloyd-Jones

ORRIGHT! This is the best thing I've learned in Hobart! And I don't think anything's gonna top it...!
Those of you who are my Facebook friends (yeah, I'm on there as well...) know that P. T. Forsyth is my hero. He's a little-known, under-appreciated, Scottish-born, German-trained, early-twentieth century English Congregationalist minister. He trained for ministry in the late 19th century, when theological Liberalism was all the rage. At that time, sin, judgement, Christ's death as atonement, etc, were all dismissed as "outdated notions". In his early days, he was a thoroughgoing Liberal. Nevertheless, as he did ministry and read the Bible, he became convinced that God was holy, and that he, P. T. Forsyth, was a sinner - a rebel against this most holy God. And he became convinced that the only way of being reconciled to this most holy God was through Christ's mighty act of atonement - the cross. It was a change of attitude that can only be described as a conversion. Forsyth's mature days were devoted to preaching Christ, and him crucified.
I first came across Forsyth on two fateful days in January 2005. I happened to have his book, The Cruciality of the Cross, on my bookshelf. I started to read it - and got totally hooked. Read it cover-to-cover in two days straight. Fantastic stuff.
Martyn Lloyd-Jones is a late-twentieth century English Nonconformist preacher, known for his passionate preaching of the cross. He strongly influenced my supervisor, David Jones - along with a whole generation of English Nonconformists.
Apparently in his early years, Lloyd-Jones preached regeneration, more than forgiveness. Faced with a dead church and rampant nominalism, he challenged people to take their Christian profession seriously, and live Christian lives. However, someone criticised him that in the process, he wasn't pointing people to Jesus. He was just browbeating them about their need to be "born again", without telling them clearly enough about how Jesus makes us to be born again.
Lloyd-Jones took this criticism seriously, and set about doing some reading about the importance of the cross. The result was that his preaching became much more cross-focused. He preached the atonement more than regeneration.
And the book that influenced him most?
P. T. Forsyth. The Cruciality of the Cross.
[I found the reference to this in Iain Murray's biography of MLJ, "The First Forty Years", Banner of Truth (1982) pp 191 - 192.]

Comments

Anonymous said…
Hi Kamal. I just discovered your blog and have added it to my feed. Good to read this post on Forsyth. Can you please send me the reference from MLJ? I used to read a lot of 'the doctor'.

Popular posts from this blog

A better understanding of nonbelief

The Nones Project is an ongoing study into the belief systems of people who call themselves non-religious. A few weeks ago one of the project leaders,  Ryan Burge  of Washington University,  posted some really interesting preliminary results  on his Substack.  1. We've probably heard of people who are spiritual but not religious (SBNRs). SBNRs were "the largest group of nones" in the sample. They believe in the supernatural realm but not necessarily in "a God." They are "deeply skeptical of religion but highly interested in spirituality," therefore individualistic and anti-institutional.  2. But this study differentiated SBNRs from people they called Nones In Name Only, NiNos. They different to SBNRs by being religious about their spiritual. They believe not just in the supernatural but in "God." And they tend to engage in traditional communal religious practices while SBNRs practice individualised eclectic bespoke spiritual practices. The s...

The different distractions of secularity and spirituality

There has been a lot of discussion about the recent 'vibe shift' away from radical atheism back towards an openness to the supernatural. I don't think this new spirituality is necessarily an openness to the unique claims of Christ. It will more probably replace one set of commonly-accepted misunderstandings about Jesus with another.  Under radical atheism, people dismissed the Biblical claims about Jesus' resurrection because they 'knew' that it was impossible. Jesus hadn't really died. He just passed out (after being beaten and whipped and crucified) and then woke up in the tomb (and rolled away the stone himself and overcame several guards). Or the disciples hallucinated that they saw him (even though Jewish beliefs of the time didn't expect one person to rise possessing eternal life himself; they expected a general resurrection at the end of time - see John 11:24 ). Or something else.  The so-called 'explanations' of Jesus' non-resurrectio...
TGC Australia recently published an analysis by Dr Sarah Quicke of whether we are experiencing a 'quiet revival' of interest in and/or conversion to Christianity  here in Australia. It does it a good job of describing the difficulties involved in both gathering and interpreting data about religious beliefs and behaviours, e.g. the difference between the 44% who (still) call themselves Christian and the 8% of people aged 18-35 who actually "believed and lived out the gospel."  Quicke refers to the very insightful McCrindle report An Undercurrent Of Faith , released in March 2025, which uses an analytical method called cohort analysis to try and work out how a particular group of people tend to behave over time. The purpose of this post is to draw attention to one element of that report which agrees with Quicke's analysis but also adds some detail to it.  Here is what the cohort analysis showed about different age groups' identification with Christianity:  As y...