Skip to main content

Evangelism and Church part 1

Sometimes we get into debates about where we should do evangelism - in church, or outside. By "in church" we mean during the Sunday service. Should we have "seeker services", and reserve "teaching" to Bible studies? Or should we "teach" during the Sunday service, and do evangelism in Bible studies, men's group, women's group etc?
I think the whole debate is misguided.
Mission is intrinsic to the identity of the church. The church itself is essentially outward focused. Evangelism is not the church’s second nature; it is the church’s nature, full stop.
Christianity is an experience of community. The New Testament terms it “fellowship” – koinonia. God, through Christ’s death and resurrection, brings us into fellowship with his triune self (Matt 11:27; John 17:3, 10-11). Those who have been redeemed by Christ also have fellowship with one another. Christ did not redeem solitary individuals; he redeemed the church, a community, a people for himself (Eph 2:11-22; 1 Peter 2:9-10).
This fellowship is not passive. It is not a synonym for socialising – what we do after the church service, over a cup of tea. Fellowship is active, and outsider-focused. This is because the God with whom we have fellowship is active, and outsider-focused. The persons of the Trinity are essentially focused on each other, and have been rejoicing in each other from all eternity. The gospel of Jesus’ life, death and resurrection is an expression of that mutual joy. Jesus was the first missionary. He came to seek and save the lost (Luke 19:10). The Father rejoiced to plan to save sinners; the Son rejoiced to put that plan into action; the Spirit rejoiced to empower the Son to do so, and continues to rejoice in applying that salvation to sinners. So to say “God is love” (1 John 4:8, 16) is not an abstract philosophical statement, but a deep statement as to the nature of God himself. The triune God really is love, and has shown it in the cross of Christ.
So, the church that God brings into being must also be outsider-focused – or else it is not Christ’s church (Matt 5:13-16; Romans 5:6-8). As Christians, we should naturally want to share what we have – our relationship with God – with others. We must, with John, “proclaim to you what we have seen and heard, so that you also may have fellowship with us” (1 John 1:3) as we enjoy “fellowship… with the Father and with his Son, Jesus Christ” (ibid). As we do so, we “make our joy complete” (1 John 1:4). The normal Christian, and the normal church, should desperately want to expand its community, so that more people share the fellowship with God that we enjoy.
This active, missionary fellowship is not reserved for authorised “priests”. All Christians have been gifted to build up the body of Christ in some way (1 Cor ch 12; Eph 4:1-16; Php 2:25; 1 Peter 1:5). Indeed, in one sense, the way the church evangelises is simply by being itself. As we share community with each other, that community, because it is founded and brought into being by the gospel of Christ, testifies to Christ – or else it is not a Christian community (Romans ch 12; Titus ch 2; 1 Peter 2:12).
So how does this actually work itself out in local churches? I'll address that in part 2...
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The different distractions of secularity and spirituality

There has been a lot of discussion about the recent 'vibe shift' away from radical atheism back towards an openness to the supernatural. I don't think this new spirituality is necessarily an openness to the unique claims of Christ. It will more probably replace one set of commonly-accepted misunderstandings about Jesus with another.  Under radical atheism, people dismissed the Biblical claims about Jesus' resurrection because they 'knew' that it was impossible. Jesus hadn't really died. He just passed out (after being beaten and whipped and crucified) and then woke up in the tomb (and rolled away the stone himself and overcame several guards). Or the disciples hallucinated that they saw him (even though Jewish beliefs of the time didn't expect one person to rise possessing eternal life himself; they expected a general resurrection at the end of time - see John 11:24 ). Or something else.  The so-called 'explanations' of Jesus' non-resurrectio...
Post a Comment
Read more

A better understanding of nonbelief

The Nones Project is an ongoing study into the belief systems of people who call themselves non-religious. A few weeks ago one of the project leaders,  Ryan Burge  of Washington University,  posted some really interesting preliminary results  on his Substack.  1. We've probably heard of people who are spiritual but not religious (SBNRs). SBNRs were "the largest group of nones" in the sample. They believe in the supernatural realm but not necessarily in "a God." They are "deeply skeptical of religion but highly interested in spirituality," therefore individualistic and anti-institutional.  2. But this study differentiated SBNRs from people they called Nones In Name Only, NiNos. They different to SBNRs by being religious about their spiritual. They believe not just in the supernatural but in "God." And they tend to engage in traditional communal religious practices while SBNRs practice individualised eclectic bespoke spiritual practices. The s...
Post a Comment
Read more

Wax and Wright on the definition of "mission"

Trevin Wax has written a clear, simple, and charitable introduction to a debate about the nature and boundaries of the kinds of Christian activities that validly should be called "mission." In brief:  Should we use a broad definition, where "mission" encompasses all the various purposes which God calls Christians and the church in general to perform, e.g. being ethical at work; general acts of care and charity; standing against systematic oppression and working towards justice instead? If so, "evangelism" is only one part of the church's mission - a central, necessary, and irreplaceable part, but only one part nonetheless. The latter kinds of activities don't save anyone for eternity, but they do genuine good in this world which please God. And that kind of good makes a real difference in many parts of the world which have not benefited from the kind of Christian moral transformation which the West benefited from - the kind of moral transformation...
Post a Comment
Read more