Skip to main content

What does it mean to be Church?

Here's my current notes for my third and final talk at the SBM weekend away. I'm working towards a missional ecclesiology - another fashionable but fraught topic. I've had a read of Tim Chester & Steve Timm's book Total Church. Interesting.
As ever, feedback highly appreciated.
* * * * *
Church is the family of people who have been redeemed from sin by Christ’s death and resurrection. Their defining characteristics are faith and repentance: they trust Jesus to be forgiven, and they have turned from sin, to follow Jesus.
On the one hand, the church is a foretaste of the end. In heaven, we’re going to be gathered around Jesus, being ruled by him, worshiping and praising him—which is what we should be doing on earth. Heaven is an eternal church service.
But we’re not in heaven yet. The church is still in the world—a world in rebellion against the God we serve. While we’re in this world, we must be characterised by two things: repentance, and evangelism.
Although we’re not of the world, we’re from the world—we once were sinners; now we’re redeemed, saved. Having come from the world, we all have sinful habits and behaviours that still hang around. Many of them will be cultural; many will be ‘blind spots’ to us. This is why we need the church—God’s community. The church is a workshop for Godliness, where we confess our worldliness to each other, and call each other to repent of it. For the church to be that, it must be both safe and challenging: safe enough so people can honestly confess their sins and failings; but also unequivocally challenging people to repent of those sins and failings. Hmmm—that’s exactly what Jesus did. “I do not condemn you… [but] go and leave your life of sin” (John 8:11).
This repentance will itself be evangelistic. Godly relationships will themselves testify to the God we serve. People will see how we’re different to the world, different to worldly culture. They’ll see how we’re constantly confessing, challenging, and repenting—and they’ll be threatened by it. The sins we’re confessing and repenting of will be sins they’re living in. As we confess and repent, they’ll feel judged; and they’ll hate us for it. But we can’t leave it at internal church relationships. Church is dynamic because the gospel is dynamic, and the gospel is dynamic because God is dynamic (ref talk 1). Every church should be outward focused, seeking to expand God’s kingdom as much as possible, because our God is outward-focused, and seeks to expand his kingdom as much as possible.

Comments

Kamal Weerakoon said…
One person emailed me the foll. comment:
What do you think repentance is? Primarily turning from Sin towards God, or is it a turning to God that therefore entails a turning from sin (i.e. 1 Thess 1:10 providing the model). I think the latter and think that this is the emphasis in the NT. It actually makes repentance positive and a step towards freedom and real human life, and rescues us from a sin-obsessed moralism (well, at least it helps!).
John McClean said…
Kamal,
Again I think the approach is fine. Just some ideas about emphasis (which might come out in the talks anyway). I think Christian's need to see that church is at the centre of God's plans and so is a big priority in our lives. Church is also key to mission, we are meant to live and proclaim together. Lots of practical implications from that.

Popular posts from this blog

The different distractions of secularity and spirituality

There has been a lot of discussion about the recent 'vibe shift' away from radical atheism back towards an openness to the supernatural. I don't think this new spirituality is necessarily an openness to the unique claims of Christ. It will more probably replace one set of commonly-accepted misunderstandings about Jesus with another.  Under radical atheism, people dismissed the Biblical claims about Jesus' resurrection because they 'knew' that it was impossible. Jesus hadn't really died. He just passed out (after being beaten and whipped and crucified) and then woke up in the tomb (and rolled away the stone himself and overcame several guards). Or the disciples hallucinated that they saw him (even though Jewish beliefs of the time didn't expect one person to rise possessing eternal life himself; they expected a general resurrection at the end of time - see John 11:24 ). Or something else.  The so-called 'explanations' of Jesus' non-resurrectio...

A better understanding of nonbelief

The Nones Project is an ongoing study into the belief systems of people who call themselves non-religious. A few weeks ago one of the project leaders,  Ryan Burge  of Washington University,  posted some really interesting preliminary results  on his Substack.  1. We've probably heard of people who are spiritual but not religious (SBNRs). SBNRs were "the largest group of nones" in the sample. They believe in the supernatural realm but not necessarily in "a God." They are "deeply skeptical of religion but highly interested in spirituality," therefore individualistic and anti-institutional.  2. But this study differentiated SBNRs from people they called Nones In Name Only, NiNos. They different to SBNRs by being religious about their spiritual. They believe not just in the supernatural but in "God." And they tend to engage in traditional communal religious practices while SBNRs practice individualised eclectic bespoke spiritual practices. The s...

Wax and Wright on the definition of "mission"

Trevin Wax has written a clear, simple, and charitable introduction to a debate about the nature and boundaries of the kinds of Christian activities that validly should be called "mission." In brief:  Should we use a broad definition, where "mission" encompasses all the various purposes which God calls Christians and the church in general to perform, e.g. being ethical at work; general acts of care and charity; standing against systematic oppression and working towards justice instead? If so, "evangelism" is only one part of the church's mission - a central, necessary, and irreplaceable part, but only one part nonetheless. The latter kinds of activities don't save anyone for eternity, but they do genuine good in this world which please God. And that kind of good makes a real difference in many parts of the world which have not benefited from the kind of Christian moral transformation which the West benefited from - the kind of moral transformation...