Skip to main content

Sermon application 1: towards persuasive preaching

Over the last month I’ve been leading seminars at MEPC on how to preach. Preparing for them was both intimidating and rewarding. It was intimidating, because I’m only a novice preacher myself. I don’t have a wealth of experience to draw from. It was rewarding because I could draw on what I’ve been taught about preaching, thus refreshing and consolidating my own preaching.
Over the next few days, I’ll put up some posts on what I said about application. It’s a framework which tries to make application compelling, motivating, persuasive. It’s an attempt to bridge that ugly ditch between head and heart, between information and transformation. I’d like your feedback on it.
Ephesians 4:22-24:

22 You were taught, with regard to your former way of life, to put off your old self, which is being corrupted by its deceitful desires; 23 to be made new in the attitude of your minds; 24 and to put on the new self, created to be like God in true righteousness and holiness.

Application needs to be both negative and positive. It needs to exhort people to ‘put off’ the old, and encourage people to ‘put on’ the new. This is a call to repentance: turning away from sin, Satan and the world, and turning to God (1 Thess 1:9). It is also a call to faith: rejecting faith in false gods and idols, and putting our faith in the one true God, who has revealed himself in Christ Jesus (Acts 17:22-34).
I think Ephesians 4:22-24 gives us three very useful categories for application:

  1. The way we think, our worldview;
  2. Who we are, as individual Christians, and corporately as families, churches and communities; and
  3. What we want, our desires.
In my next few posts, I’ll expand on each of these three, with examples. For now, let me explain the logic underlying them.
At all three points, we need to give people specific directions for God-ward change, which are relevant for their particular circumstance. This is why we need to know our congregations well. We need to know how the world, the flesh and the devil seek to control them, and hinder their growth in loving and serving God and each other. The better we know them, the closer we can target our specific advice for change.
I hope this specificity makes the application compelling. I hope people think “yes – that describes me! If everyone else is gossiping about someone, it’s easier for me to join in and laugh with them, rather than trying to defend the person. But I can see that God would want me to say something nice about the person instead – even if everyone then turns on me, and bags me out”. That might be one application of Ephesians 4:29, “Do not let any unwholesome talk come out of your mouths, but only what is helpful for building others up according to their needs, that it may benefit those who listen.”
I hope this framework also helps us motivate people to make this change. This motivation won’t come fundamentally from our oratorical prowess as preachers. Rather, I hope it comes from by our hearers being convicted that the specific directions we’re giving them enact the true, healthy, God-honouring life that the passage calls us to live. I want my congregation to see the world and themselves differently, so that they find those specific directions compelling, persuasive (hence, worldview – self – desires). I want them to see that the anti-God way of living is, from God’s point of view, sick and disgusting. I want them to be repelled from it. And I want them to see God’s way of living as beautiful, healthy. I want them to be attracted to it.
Thoughts, anyone?

Comments

Unknown said…
BookMan. . just started subscribing to your blog! It's totally awesome :) (i would give it 5/5 if not for the Jane Austen)

Loved reading your reflections on application. . .i feel like vomiting every time i hear a sermon that ends with "and this is all fulfilled in the Gospel. . let's pray".

Really like the repelled and attracted part of application. Definitely going to use it as i finish off tonight's bible study!

In terms of further thoughts on the thinking part. . i'd also like (where there is appropriate time/place) to help the congregation understand the worldview themselves too. How are we as a community being impacted by the world, media, popular conscience, recent news tells us that blah blah etc. . .

And as individuals, we also need to ask the 'why?' question behind our specific acts of rebellion - e.g. we both might gossip, but for different reasons [fear of man or judgementalism].

Anyways, power on Kamal. . .it's great to read about your ministry escapades ;)

Popular posts from this blog

A better understanding of nonbelief

The Nones Project is an ongoing study into the belief systems of people who call themselves non-religious. A few weeks ago one of the project leaders,  Ryan Burge  of Washington University,  posted some really interesting preliminary results  on his Substack.  1. We've probably heard of people who are spiritual but not religious (SBNRs). SBNRs were "the largest group of nones" in the sample. They believe in the supernatural realm but not necessarily in "a God." They are "deeply skeptical of religion but highly interested in spirituality," therefore individualistic and anti-institutional.  2. But this study differentiated SBNRs from people they called Nones In Name Only, NiNos. They different to SBNRs by being religious about their spiritual. They believe not just in the supernatural but in "God." And they tend to engage in traditional communal religious practices while SBNRs practice individualised eclectic bespoke spiritual practices. The s...

The different distractions of secularity and spirituality

There has been a lot of discussion about the recent 'vibe shift' away from radical atheism back towards an openness to the supernatural. I don't think this new spirituality is necessarily an openness to the unique claims of Christ. It will more probably replace one set of commonly-accepted misunderstandings about Jesus with another.  Under radical atheism, people dismissed the Biblical claims about Jesus' resurrection because they 'knew' that it was impossible. Jesus hadn't really died. He just passed out (after being beaten and whipped and crucified) and then woke up in the tomb (and rolled away the stone himself and overcame several guards). Or the disciples hallucinated that they saw him (even though Jewish beliefs of the time didn't expect one person to rise possessing eternal life himself; they expected a general resurrection at the end of time - see John 11:24 ). Or something else.  The so-called 'explanations' of Jesus' non-resurrectio...
TGC Australia recently published an analysis by Dr Sarah Quicke of whether we are experiencing a 'quiet revival' of interest in and/or conversion to Christianity  here in Australia. It does it a good job of describing the difficulties involved in both gathering and interpreting data about religious beliefs and behaviours, e.g. the difference between the 44% who (still) call themselves Christian and the 8% of people aged 18-35 who actually "believed and lived out the gospel."  Quicke refers to the very insightful McCrindle report An Undercurrent Of Faith , released in March 2025, which uses an analytical method called cohort analysis to try and work out how a particular group of people tend to behave over time. The purpose of this post is to draw attention to one element of that report which agrees with Quicke's analysis but also adds some detail to it.  Here is what the cohort analysis showed about different age groups' identification with Christianity:  As y...