Skip to main content

Carson on Christ and Culture

In Christ and Culture Revisited, Don Carson says that a comprehensive view of the great turning points of Biblical redemptive history – creation and the fall; Israel and the law; Christ and the new covenant; and heaven and hell – permits a nuanced Christian response to culture. He says if we keep all four turning points in our mind at all times, we might be able to discern what to affirm in culture, and what to criticise. On pages 45-59, Carson draws implications from each of the four great turning points of redemptive history.

From creation and the fall:
  • Humans are all equal, in God’s image.
  • As such, we are responsible to God, “we owe him” (p 46, italics in original).
  • As God’s image-bearers we have the privilege and responsibility of governing the world.
  • We are bodies, we must use our physical bodies to serve God, each other and the world.
  • Sin is first of all God-focused – it is rejecting God as God, it is idolatry and pride.
  • Secondly, sin is social – we break God’s law, and hurt each other.
  • Yet God, in his ‘common grace’, restrains evil, so there is yet much good in the world.
From Israel and the Law:
  • God graciously chooses a people for himself.
  • The fact that the law affected every part of life demonstrates that God demands Lordship over every part of his people’s life.
  • The Law simultaneously shows us to be guilty and stained by sin, and provides for forgiveness and cleansing.
  • Israel’s social institutions were distinct (prophet, priest, king) but were all uniformly co-ordinated towards being loyal to God. This implies that there need not be conflict between ‘church’ and ‘state’, but God can use both to advance his kingdom.
  • Israel did not exist merely for itself, but was God’s means for saving the whole world.
From Christ and the New Covenant:
  • Jesus is the mediator between God and humanity. He is the king of God’s kingdom, who has established that kingdom once for all, even though it remains contested in this age.
  • The incarnation demonstrates God’s humble self-identification with us.
  • The way Jesus established his kingdom was his cross and resurrection.
  • We now proclaim the cruciform gospel, which is God’s wisdom and power, which puts all the world’s wisdom to shame.
  • The risen Christ now pours out his Spirit upon his people, which gives his people a limited but genuine experience of God’s presence and power.
  • The new covenant people of God are not one nation but a trans-national community identified by their allegiance to Christ.
From heaven and hell:
  • Current relationships between Christ and culture are not eternal.
  • Nothing in this world will be perfect. Perfection will come when Christ returns.

In my next post, I'll try and use these to analyse a Christian approach to parenting. Stay tuned!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The different distractions of secularity and spirituality

There has been a lot of discussion about the recent 'vibe shift' away from radical atheism back towards an openness to the supernatural. I don't think this new spirituality is necessarily an openness to the unique claims of Christ. It will more probably replace one set of commonly-accepted misunderstandings about Jesus with another.  Under radical atheism, people dismissed the Biblical claims about Jesus' resurrection because they 'knew' that it was impossible. Jesus hadn't really died. He just passed out (after being beaten and whipped and crucified) and then woke up in the tomb (and rolled away the stone himself and overcame several guards). Or the disciples hallucinated that they saw him (even though Jewish beliefs of the time didn't expect one person to rise possessing eternal life himself; they expected a general resurrection at the end of time - see John 11:24 ). Or something else.  The so-called 'explanations' of Jesus' non-resurrectio...

A better understanding of nonbelief

The Nones Project is an ongoing study into the belief systems of people who call themselves non-religious. A few weeks ago one of the project leaders,  Ryan Burge  of Washington University,  posted some really interesting preliminary results  on his Substack.  1. We've probably heard of people who are spiritual but not religious (SBNRs). SBNRs were "the largest group of nones" in the sample. They believe in the supernatural realm but not necessarily in "a God." They are "deeply skeptical of religion but highly interested in spirituality," therefore individualistic and anti-institutional.  2. But this study differentiated SBNRs from people they called Nones In Name Only, NiNos. They different to SBNRs by being religious about their spiritual. They believe not just in the supernatural but in "God." And they tend to engage in traditional communal religious practices while SBNRs practice individualised eclectic bespoke spiritual practices. The s...

Wax and Wright on the definition of "mission"

Trevin Wax has written a clear, simple, and charitable introduction to a debate about the nature and boundaries of the kinds of Christian activities that validly should be called "mission." In brief:  Should we use a broad definition, where "mission" encompasses all the various purposes which God calls Christians and the church in general to perform, e.g. being ethical at work; general acts of care and charity; standing against systematic oppression and working towards justice instead? If so, "evangelism" is only one part of the church's mission - a central, necessary, and irreplaceable part, but only one part nonetheless. The latter kinds of activities don't save anyone for eternity, but they do genuine good in this world which please God. And that kind of good makes a real difference in many parts of the world which have not benefited from the kind of Christian moral transformation which the West benefited from - the kind of moral transformation...