Skip to main content

Identifying with the congregation in preaching

At the Calvin Conference a couple of weeks back, Peter Barnes, of Revesby Presbyterian, delivered a paper on Calvin's preaching. For me, the most interesting part of the paper was how naturally Calvin identified with the congregation. In his sermons, he normally said "we" and "us", not "I" and "you". In his sermons from 1556 to 1558, he only referred to himself three times. A statistical analysis of his sermons on Acts shows he said "we" (French nous) 3,416 times, compared to"you" (vous) only 53 times.
So I take it that Calvin thought of himself, even when preaching, as fundamentally a member of the congregation. Even as a preacher, he remained a sinner saved by grace, being addressed by God through his word. He did not become a priest or prophet, in the sense of mediating the word of God to the congregation. He stood "alongside" the congregation, not "over" them. Only God, in Christ, through the Bible, was "over" the congregation - the congregation which included Calvin.
This is very interesting. It's easy for us who are trained, "professional" preachers to think of ourselves as different from the people we're addressing. Not for bad reasons - for good reasons. We're trained to think outside ourselves - to think of our people, and how this passage applies to them. That's not selfish; that's loving & serving. Also, it's true that preaching is in a sense prophecy - we're not just telling people our opinions, we're telling them what God says. That's not selfish, that's God-honouring.
But both these good motives can have a negative effect of making us think we're different. Because both permit us to think of ourselves as mediating God's word to people. We need to remember that we, like Calvin, remain fundamentally a member of the congregation being addressed by God through his word, the Bible. Only God, in Christ, through the Bible, is "over" the congregation - the congregation which includes us preachers.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A better understanding of nonbelief

The Nones Project is an ongoing study into the belief systems of people who call themselves non-religious. A few weeks ago one of the project leaders,  Ryan Burge  of Washington University,  posted some really interesting preliminary results  on his Substack.  1. We've probably heard of people who are spiritual but not religious (SBNRs). SBNRs were "the largest group of nones" in the sample. They believe in the supernatural realm but not necessarily in "a God." They are "deeply skeptical of religion but highly interested in spirituality," therefore individualistic and anti-institutional.  2. But this study differentiated SBNRs from people they called Nones In Name Only, NiNos. They different to SBNRs by being religious about their spiritual. They believe not just in the supernatural but in "God." And they tend to engage in traditional communal religious practices while SBNRs practice individualised eclectic bespoke spiritual practices. The s...

The different distractions of secularity and spirituality

There has been a lot of discussion about the recent 'vibe shift' away from radical atheism back towards an openness to the supernatural. I don't think this new spirituality is necessarily an openness to the unique claims of Christ. It will more probably replace one set of commonly-accepted misunderstandings about Jesus with another.  Under radical atheism, people dismissed the Biblical claims about Jesus' resurrection because they 'knew' that it was impossible. Jesus hadn't really died. He just passed out (after being beaten and whipped and crucified) and then woke up in the tomb (and rolled away the stone himself and overcame several guards). Or the disciples hallucinated that they saw him (even though Jewish beliefs of the time didn't expect one person to rise possessing eternal life himself; they expected a general resurrection at the end of time - see John 11:24 ). Or something else.  The so-called 'explanations' of Jesus' non-resurrectio...
TGC Australia recently published an analysis by Dr Sarah Quicke of whether we are experiencing a 'quiet revival' of interest in and/or conversion to Christianity  here in Australia. It does it a good job of describing the difficulties involved in both gathering and interpreting data about religious beliefs and behaviours, e.g. the difference between the 44% who (still) call themselves Christian and the 8% of people aged 18-35 who actually "believed and lived out the gospel."  Quicke refers to the very insightful McCrindle report An Undercurrent Of Faith , released in March 2025, which uses an analytical method called cohort analysis to try and work out how a particular group of people tend to behave over time. The purpose of this post is to draw attention to one element of that report which agrees with Quicke's analysis but also adds some detail to it.  Here is what the cohort analysis showed about different age groups' identification with Christianity:  As y...